We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Commission of Oyer and Terminer in Legal History
Definition & Meaning
The commission of Oyer and Terminer is a formal appointment granted by a royal authority that allows judges to preside over serious criminal cases, specifically felonies and treason. This commission empowers judges to conduct trials during the assize circuit, where they not only hear cases but also determine their outcomes. Before a judge can proceed with a trial, they must first gather evidence through a grand jury or inquest. Only after this inquiry can they utilize a petit jury to reach a verdict.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The commission of Oyer and Terminer is primarily used in criminal law. It plays a crucial role in the judicial process for serious offenses, ensuring that there is a structured method for handling indictments during the assize circuit. Users may encounter this term when dealing with felony charges or when involved in the judicial process as a juror or defendant. Legal templates related to this commission can be found on platforms like US Legal Forms, which provide resources for individuals navigating these serious legal matters.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A judge receives a commission of Oyer and Terminer to preside over a series of felony trials in their jurisdiction. They first gather evidence through a grand jury, which leads to the indictment of several defendants. The judge then conducts trials with a petit jury to determine the outcomes.
Example 2: (hypothetical example) A judge in a historical context is tasked with overseeing treason cases related to a rebellion. They utilize the commission of Oyer and Terminer to ensure that all legal procedures are followed during the trials.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Variation
New York
Commission is often used in high-profile criminal cases.
California
Similar commissions are utilized, but modern statutes may differ in terminology.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Grand jury
A group that examines evidence to determine if there is enough to charge someone with a crime.
Focuses on evidence gathering, while Oyer and Terminer involves trial proceedings.
Petit jury
A jury that decides the verdict in a trial.
Used after the grand jury's inquiry in the Oyer and Terminer process.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself involved in a legal matter related to the commission of Oyer and Terminer, it is essential to understand your rights and the judicial process. Consider consulting a legal professional for guidance. Additionally, you can explore US Legal Forms for templates and resources that may help you navigate your situation more effectively.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.