We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What is the Business Judgment Rule and Its Legal Implications?
Definition & Meaning
The business judgment rule is a legal principle that protects corporate officers, directors, and agents from being held liable for decisions made in good faith that result in losses for the corporation. This rule assumes that directors act with a genuine concern for the corporation's best interests. Courts generally do not question the decisions of directors unless there is a clear allegation that they have failed to act with due care or have engaged in misconduct, such as fraud or misappropriation of funds.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The business judgment rule is primarily used in corporate law. It serves as a defense for directors and officers when their decisions are challenged in court. This rule is essential in ensuring that corporate leaders can make decisions without the constant fear of legal repercussions, as long as they act in good faith and with reasonable care. Users can manage related legal documents using templates from US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A company's board decides to invest in a new technology after conducting thorough market research. Even if the investment fails, the directors are protected by the business judgment rule as they acted in good faith and based their decision on informed analysis.
Example 2: A director who decides to sell a division of the company to focus on core operations, believing it to be in the best interest of the corporation, is also protected under this rule, provided they acted without personal gain. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
The business judgment rule is primarily derived from case law rather than specific statutes. A notable case is Smith v. Van Gorkom, 488 A.2d 858 (Del. 1985), which established the importance of informed decision-making for directors.
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
Delaware
Strongly supports the business judgment rule; courts are generally deferential to directors' decisions.
California
Similar protections, but with additional scrutiny on conflicts of interest.
New York
Also follows the business judgment rule, but may require more evidence of due diligence.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Business Judgment Rule
Protection for directors making decisions in good faith.
Focuses on the intent and informed basis of decisions.
Duty of Care
Legal obligation to act in the best interest of the corporation.
More about the standard of conduct expected from directors.
Self-Dealing
Transactions where directors benefit personally at the corporation's expense.
Contradicts the business judgment rule if proven.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are a director or officer facing potential liability for a business decision, consider the following steps:
Document the decision-making process and the information considered.
Ensure that your actions align with the best interests of the corporation.
Consult with legal professionals to understand your rights and responsibilities.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can assist in documenting corporate decisions.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.