We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Both to Blame Clause in Maritime Legal Context
Definition & Meaning
The "both to blame clause" is a provision found in certain bills of lading, which are legal documents issued by a carrier to acknowledge receipt of cargo for shipment. This clause addresses liability in the event of a collision between two vessels, particularly when both vessels are at fault. It stipulates that if two ships collide, each vessel is responsible for a portion of the damages based on the extent of the damage they caused to each other. Furthermore, the clause allows the vessel with lesser damage to seek contributions from the cargo being carried, ensuring that all parties with financial interests in the voyage share in the losses proportionately. This clause overrides other loss allocation provisions in ocean marine insurance policies.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The both to blame clause is primarily used in maritime law, particularly in the context of shipping and cargo transportation. It is relevant for shipowners, cargo owners, and insurers involved in maritime operations. This clause can affect how damages are allocated when incidents occur at sea, making it crucial for parties involved in shipping to understand its implications. Users can manage related legal documents through platforms like US Legal Forms, which provide templates for bills of lading and other maritime contracts.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) If Vessel A and Vessel B collide, and Vessel A sustains $100,000 in damages while Vessel B sustains $50,000, the both to blame clause would require both vessels to share the costs. Vessel A might seek $25,000 from the cargo on Vessel B to cover its liability to Vessel B.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
General Average
A principle in maritime law where all parties share the losses resulting from a voluntary sacrifice of part of the ship or cargo to save the whole.
Both to blame clause focuses on collisions and shared fault, while general average deals with voluntary sacrifices for safety.
Limitation of Liability
A legal principle that allows a shipowner to limit their liability to the value of the ship and cargo after an incident.
Limitation of liability caps the financial responsibility of the shipowner, whereas both to blame clause allocates shared responsibility in collisions.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a maritime incident where the both to blame clause may apply, consider the following steps:
Review your bill of lading and insurance policy to understand your rights and obligations.
Document the damages and any communications with other parties involved.
Consult a legal professional if you are unsure about your liabilities or how to proceed.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates related to maritime agreements and liability waivers.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.