US Legal Forms
Legal Resources
Questions & Answers
Evidence
What is meant by the phrase "fruit of the poisonous tree?"

What is meant by the phrase "fruit of the poisonous tree?"

Q: What does the fruit represent in a poison tree?

In the phrase 'fruit of the poisonous tree,' the 'fruit' represents evidence or information obtained as a result of illegal actions, such as unlawful searches or arrests. If the initial source of this evidence is tainted, the derived evidence is also considered tainted and typically inadmissible in court.

Q: What is fruit of the poisonous tree famous examples?

Famous examples include the cases of Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), where evidence obtained from an illegal search was excluded, and Nix v. Williams, 467 U.S. 431 (1984), which clarified exceptions to the doctrine. These cases illustrate how the doctrine protects individuals from unlawful evidence gathering.

Q: What is the fruit of the poisonous tree refers to?

The phrase 'fruit of the poisonous tree' refers to evidence that is derived from an illegal source. If the original evidence was obtained through unlawful means, any subsequent evidence or information resulting from it is also considered tainted and generally inadmissible in court.

Q: What is meant by fruit of the poisonous tree?

The term 'fruit of the poisonous tree' means that if evidence is obtained through illegal actions, such as violating constitutional rights, then any evidence derived from that illegal source is also inadmissible in court. This principle aims to deter law enforcement from using unlawful methods to gather evidence.

Full question:

What is meant by the phrase "fruit of the poisonous tree?"

Category: Evidence
Date: 04/07/2025
State: National

Answer:

The phrase “fruit of the poisonous tree” is a legal phrase used in the United States to describe evidence gathered with the aid of information obtained illegally. The logic of the terminology is that if the source of the evidence (the "tree") is tainted, then anything gained from it (the "fruit") would also be tainted.

Such evidence is not generally admissible in court. For example, if a police officer conducted a search of a home in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution, and obtained a key to a locker in a train station, thus obtaining evidence of a crime, then that evidence would more than likely be excluded in accordance with the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine. This legal doctrine is an extension of the exclusionary rule, which, subject to some exceptions, prevents evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment from being admitted in a criminal trial. Like the exclusionary rule, the fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree doctrine is intended to deter police from using illegal means to obtain evidence.

This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.

FAQs

What is an example of the fruit of the poisonous tree case?

A well-known example is the case of Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963). In this case, evidence obtained through an illegal arrest was deemed inadmissible in court. The Supreme Court ruled that since the original arrest was unlawful, any evidence derived from it, such as a confession and drugs found later, was also inadmissible under the fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine.