Can I use the Good Samaritan defense for emergency treatment provided?

Full question:

Last week a patient had come as an emergency case. This patient also has his family doctor working in the same hospital but, as he was busy, his patient’s case was bought to me. I performed some emergency treatment on him before his doctor came and took charge of the further treatment. Now this doctor claims that due to my negligent treatment his patient got some severe medical issues. Can I claim the Good Samaritan defense in this case?

  • Category: Helping People
  • Subcategory: Good Samaritan Laws
  • Date:
  • State: Colorado

Answer:

Yes, you can claim the Good Samaritan defense in this situation. You provided emergency treatment in good faith while the patient's regular doctor was unavailable. Under Colorado law, if you render emergency care without compensation and in good faith, you are generally not liable for civil damages unless your actions were grossly negligent or willful and wanton. However, if you had a pre-existing obligation to care for the patient, you would not be protected by the Good Samaritan law (C.R.S. 13-21-108).

This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.

FAQs

If a patient wants to leave against medical advice (AMA), first ensure they are fully informed of the risks involved in leaving. Document the conversation and the patient's decision. Encourage them to stay and seek further treatment, but respect their autonomy. If they insist on leaving, have them sign an AMA form to acknowledge their choice. This protects you from liability, as it shows the patient understands the potential consequences of their decision.