Can my friend demand higher maintenance due to misleading income information?

Full question:

My friend and her husband entered a premarital agreement under which, it was stated: “ in case of divorce, her husband will pay her maintenance of $1000 per month as he was earning gross salary of $4000.” But actually his monthly income was $6000. Can my friend now demand higher maintenance?

  • Category: Marriage
  • Subcategory: Premarital Agreements
  • Date:
  • State: California

Answer:

Yes. In California, a premarital agreement may not be enforceable if one spouse provided misleading information that influenced the other spouse's agreement to its terms. If your friend can demonstrate that the agreement is not enforceable due to this misleading information, she may be entitled to higher maintenance.

According to California Family Code § 1615, a premarital agreement is unenforceable if the party against whom enforcement is sought proves one of the following: (1) they did not execute the agreement voluntarily, or (2) the agreement was unconscionable when executed and the party did not receive fair disclosure of the other party's financial situation, did not waive their right to such disclosure, and did not have adequate knowledge of the other party's finances.

This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.

FAQs

A prenuptial agreement is created before marriage and outlines how assets and debts will be handled in the event of divorce. A postnuptial agreement is formed after marriage and serves a similar purpose, addressing financial matters that arise during the marriage. Both agreements require full disclosure of finances and must be voluntary to be enforceable.