We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Actus Inceptus Cujus Perfectio Pendet Ex Voluntate Partium Revocari Potest, Si Autem Pendet Ex Voluntate Tertiae Personae, Vel Ex Contingenti, Revocar
Understanding Actus Inceptus Cujus Perfectio Pendet Ex Voluntate Partium Revocari Potest: Legal Principles and Applications
Definition & Meaning
The term "actus inceptus cujus perfectio pendet ex voluntate partium revocari potest" refers to an act that has been initiated but is not yet completed. The completion of this act depends on the will of the parties involved, meaning they have the authority to revoke it. Conversely, if the act relies on the consent of a third party or is contingent upon certain conditions, it cannot be revoked. This concept is important in understanding the dynamics of agreements and obligations in legal contexts.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in contract law and civil law. It helps clarify when a party can withdraw from an agreement or action before it is fully executed. Understanding this principle is essential in various legal practices, including:
Contract negotiations
Real estate transactions
Business agreements
Users can manage some aspects of these situations using legal templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A couple starts the process of buying a house. They can revoke their offer to purchase if both agree to do so before the sale is finalized.
Example 2: A business begins negotiations for a partnership but decides to withdraw before signing any contracts. Since the agreement was not finalized, they can revoke their intention (hypothetical example).
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Difference
California
Allows for revocation under specific conditions outlined in state contract law.
New York
Emphasizes the need for mutual consent in revocation processes.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Actus Reus
The physical act of committing a crime.
Focuses on criminal actions rather than voluntary acts in contracts.
Unilateral Contract
A contract where only one party makes a promise.
Does not necessarily involve the same conditions for revocation.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where this term applies, consider the following steps:
Review the agreements or contracts involved to understand your rights.
Consult with a legal professional if the situation is complex or if you need specific advice.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates and resources that can assist you in managing your legal needs.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.