We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Zipper Clause in Employment Agreements
Definition & Meaning
A zipper clause is a provision in an employment contract that indicates both parties, typically the employer and the employee, agree to waive the right to negotiate on any issues not explicitly addressed in the contract. This means that once the contract is signed, any matters that were not included in the agreement cannot be brought up for bargaining later, even if they were considered during negotiations. Essentially, a zipper clause clarifies that the written agreement encompasses the complete understanding between the parties involved.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Zipper clauses are commonly found in employment agreements and collective bargaining agreements. They are used to establish clear boundaries regarding what has been agreed upon between employers and employees or their associations. This clause is particularly relevant in labor law, where it helps prevent disputes over unaddressed issues after a contract is finalized. Users can manage their agreements using legal templates available through services like US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A school district and a teachers' association negotiate a contract that includes a zipper clause stating that all terms have been agreed upon, preventing future negotiations on salary increases until the next contract cycle.
(Hypothetical example) Example 2: A tech company and its employees sign an agreement with a zipper clause that specifies all working conditions are finalized, meaning employees cannot later demand changes to work hours or benefits that were not included in the contract.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Variation
California
Generally favors collective bargaining agreements with zipper clauses.
New York
Enforces zipper clauses but with specific limitations on certain employee rights.
Texas
Allows zipper clauses but requires clear language to avoid ambiguity.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Zipper Clause
A clause waiving future negotiations on unaddressed matters.
Focuses on the finality of the agreement.
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU)
A document outlining mutual agreements between parties.
Typically non-binding and allows for future negotiations.
Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA)
A contract between an employer and a union representing employees.
May include zipper clauses but covers broader topics.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are entering into an employment agreement with a zipper clause, it is essential to review the contract carefully. Ensure you understand what is included and what is excluded from future negotiations. If you have questions or concerns, consider consulting a legal professional. You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft or review your agreement effectively.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.