Understanding the United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court

Definition & Meaning

The United States Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) is a specialized court established under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) of 1978. It consists of 11 judges who review requests from the Attorney General for surveillance warrants related to foreign intelligence activities. The proceedings of the court are typically not open to the public, ensuring confidentiality in matters of national security. Rulings made by the FISC can be appealed to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review.

Table of content

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A federal agency seeks a warrant to monitor communications of a suspected foreign agent. They submit their request to the FISC, which reviews the application and decides whether to grant the warrant.

Example 2: A privacy advocacy group challenges the legality of a surveillance program authorized by the FISC, claiming it violates constitutional rights. (hypothetical example)

Comparison with related terms

Term Definition Key Differences
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) A federal law that regulates the surveillance of foreign powers and agents. FISA is the law under which the FISC operates.
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review A court that reviews decisions made by the FISC. This court handles appeals from the FISC's rulings.

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe you are affected by surveillance authorized by the FISC, consider the following steps:

  • Consult a legal professional who specializes in national security law.
  • Explore resources available through US Legal Forms for templates related to surveillance and privacy rights.
  • Stay informed about your rights under FISA and related laws.

Quick facts

Attribute Details
Jurisdiction Federal
Number of Judges 11
Confidentiality Proceedings are not open to the public
Appeals Can be made to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review

Key takeaways