The phrase "satius est petere fontes quam sectari rivulos" translates to "it is better to seek the source than to follow the streamlets." This maxim emphasizes the importance of consulting original sources of information rather than relying solely on secondary accounts or quotes. It suggests that a thorough examination of primary materials leads to a better understanding and more accurate conclusions.
This maxim is often referenced in legal contexts, particularly in areas such as research, evidence gathering, and legal writing. Legal professionals are encouraged to seek out original documents, case law, and statutes to support their arguments and ensure accuracy. This principle is vital in civil law, criminal law, and family law, where the integrity of information can significantly impact outcomes. Users can utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to help navigate these processes effectively.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, a lawyer preparing a case may choose to review the original court rulings and statutes instead of relying on summaries provided by others. This ensures that their arguments are based on the most accurate and relevant information. (Hypothetical example)
| Term | Definition | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Sources | Original documents or evidence. | Focuses on authenticity and reliability, as opposed to secondary sources. |
| Secondary Sources | Analysis or interpretation of primary sources. | Less reliable; may contain biases or inaccuracies. |
If you find yourself needing to gather information for a legal matter, prioritize seeking out original documents and evidence. Consider using US Legal Forms for templates that can guide you in preparing necessary documents. If the situation is complex, consulting with a legal professional is advisable to ensure you are on the right track.
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It emphasizes the importance of seeking original sources of information over relying on secondary accounts.