We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Rescue Doctrine: Legal Implications for Rescuers
Definition & Meaning
The rescue doctrine is a legal principle that holds a person responsible for injuries sustained by a rescuer when the rescuer is harmed while trying to save someone else. This applies even if the rescuer is attempting to help the person who caused the danger. For instance, if someone intervenes to protect a pet from an aggressive dog and gets injured, the dog's owner may be liable for those injuries. The doctrine is based on the idea that when someone creates a dangerous situation, it is foreseeable that others will try to help, and their safety should be protected under the law.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The rescue doctrine is primarily used in personal injury law. It comes into play in civil cases where a rescuer seeks compensation for injuries incurred while attempting to save another person or property. This doctrine can be relevant in various legal contexts, including:
Personal injury claims
Negligence cases
Animal liability cases
Users can manage related legal processes using templates and forms available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person sees a child in danger of drowning in a pool. They jump in to save the child and injure themselves in the process. The child's parents may be held liable for the rescuer's injuries if they were negligent in supervising the child.
Example 2: A bystander attempts to pull a driver from a car after an accident and suffers a back injury. If the driver was distracted while driving, the driver could be held responsible for the rescuer's injury. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Rescue Doctrine Application
California
Strong application; rescuers can claim damages even if they were partially at fault.
New York
Rescue doctrine applies, but the rescuer must show the original wrongdoer was negligent.
Texas
Similar application; however, comparative negligence may reduce damages.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Duty to Rescue
The legal obligation to assist someone in peril.
Rescue doctrine focuses on liability for injuries to the rescuer, while duty to rescue pertains to the obligation to help.
Negligence
Failure to take proper care in doing something, resulting in damage or injury to another.
Negligence is the basis for liability, while the rescue doctrine specifically addresses the rescuer's injuries.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you have been injured while attempting to rescue someone or something, consider the following steps:
Document the incident, including any witnesses and evidence of negligence.
Seek medical attention for your injuries.
Consult a legal professional to discuss your rights and options for pursuing a claim.
You may also explore US Legal Forms for templates related to personal injury claims.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.