We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Pick-Sloan Flood Control Act of 1944 and Its Impact
Definition & Meaning
The Pick-Sloan Flood Control Act of 1944 is a significant piece of U.S. federal legislation aimed at managing flood control and water resources in the Missouri River Basin. Enacted to address the challenges posed by flooding, the Act authorized the construction of numerous dams and levees across the United States. It established the Pick-Sloan Missouri Basin Program, which focuses on multiple objectives, including hydropower generation, recreation, water supply, navigation, flood control, and the preservation of fish and wildlife habitats.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This Act is primarily relevant in the context of environmental law and water resource management. It is used to guide the development and maintenance of infrastructure aimed at flood control and resource management. Legal practitioners may encounter this Act when dealing with issues related to land use, environmental impact assessments, and federal funding for water projects. Users can manage related forms and procedures through resources like US Legal Forms, which provide templates for compliance and project planning.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of the Act's impact is the construction of the Fort Peck Dam in Montana, which was built to control flooding and provide hydropower. Another example is the use of reservoirs created under the Act for recreational purposes, such as fishing and boating (hypothetical example).
Relevant laws & statutes
The Pick-Sloan Flood Control Act of 1944 is the primary statute governing flood control in the Missouri River Basin. Other relevant laws may include the Flood Control Act of 1936 and various environmental regulations that impact water resource management.
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
Montana
Significant reliance on dams for flood control and irrigation.
North Dakota
Focus on managing water supply for agriculture.
South Dakota
Emphasis on recreational use of water bodies created by the Act.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Flood Control Act
Legislation aimed at reducing flood risk.
Broader scope, not limited to the Missouri River Basin.
Water Resource Management
Strategies for managing water supply and quality.
Includes a wider array of water-related issues beyond flood control.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a project related to flood control or water resource management, consider reviewing the guidelines established by the Pick-Sloan Flood Control Act. You can explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in compliance and documentation. If your situation is complex, seeking professional legal advice may be necessary.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.