We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Neutral: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition and Importance
Definition & Meaning
The term "neutral" refers to a person who assists parties involved in a dispute to reach a resolution without taking sides. Neutrals facilitate discussions, help clarify issues, and guide the parties toward a mutually acceptable agreement. They play a crucial role in various legal contexts, including mediation and arbitration.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Neutrals are commonly used in legal practices such as:
Mediation: A process where a neutral party helps disputing parties communicate and negotiate a settlement.
Arbitration: A method where a neutral third party makes a binding decision on a dispute.
Family law: Neutrals may assist in divorce or custody disputes.
Users can manage some of these processes themselves with the right legal forms, such as those offered by US Legal Forms, which are drafted by qualified attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a family law case, a couple undergoing divorce may engage a neutral mediator to help them agree on child custody arrangements. The mediator facilitates communication and helps them reach a consensus.
Example 2: In a business dispute, two companies may hire a neutral arbitrator to resolve a contract disagreement without going to court. The arbitrator reviews the evidence and makes a binding decision. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Neutral Use
California
Strong emphasis on mediation in family law disputes.
New York
Common use of arbitration for commercial disputes.
Texas
Encourages mediation as a first step in civil disputes.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Mediator
A neutral party who facilitates negotiation between disputing parties.
Focuses on communication and negotiation, not decision-making.
Arbitrator
A neutral who makes a binding decision on a dispute.
Has authority to decide the outcome, unlike a mediator.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a dispute and think a neutral might help, consider the following steps:
Identify the type of neutral you need (mediator or arbitrator).
Research qualified neutrals in your area.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can assist in the mediation or arbitration process.
If the situation is complex, consult a legal professional for tailored advice.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Typical fees for neutrals vary widely based on experience and location.
Jurisdiction: Neutrals operate under state-specific laws.
Possible outcomes include settlements or binding decisions, depending on the process used.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
A mediator is a type of neutral who specifically facilitates negotiation between parties, while a neutral can also refer to an arbitrator who makes binding decisions.
Yes, neutrals typically charge fees for their services, which can vary based on their qualifications and the complexity of the dispute.
Yes, mediation is generally confidential, meaning discussions cannot be used in court if the mediation does not result in a settlement.