We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Negligent Entrustment: What It Means and Legal Implications
Definition & Meaning
Negligent entrustment is a legal concept in tort law that occurs when one person (the entrustor) provides another person (the entrustee) with a dangerous item, such as a vehicle, without taking reasonable care to ensure that the entrustee is competent to use it safely. If the entrusted item causes harm to a third party, the entrustor may be held liable for the resulting injuries or damages. This situation often arises when someone allows another individual to drive their automobile without verifying that the person has a valid driver's license or is responsible enough to operate the vehicle safely.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Negligent entrustment is primarily used in civil law, particularly in personal injury cases. It can apply in various contexts, including:
Automobile accidents where a vehicle owner allows an unqualified driver to operate their car.
Situations involving other dangerous instruments, such as firearms or machinery.
Individuals can often manage related legal forms and procedures with the help of resources like US Legal Forms, which provides templates drafted by attorneys for various legal situations.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A parent allows their teenager, who does not have a driver's license, to drive their car. If the teenager gets into an accident and injures someone, the parent may be held liable for negligent entrustment.
Example 2: A car rental company rents a vehicle to a person with a history of reckless driving without checking their driving record. If that person causes an accident, the rental company could be found liable for negligent entrustment. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
California law allows for claims of negligent entrustment if the entrustor knew or should have known of the entrustee's unfitness.
Texas
In Texas, the law emphasizes the entrustor's knowledge of the entrustee's past behavior as a significant factor.
Florida
Florida courts may impose stricter standards for proving negligent entrustment, particularly regarding the entrustee's prior driving record.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Negligent Entrustment
Liability arising from providing a dangerous item to an unfit person.
Focuses on the entrustor's responsibility for the entrustee's actions.
Negligence
Failure to exercise reasonable care, resulting in harm to another.
More general; does not specifically involve entrusting dangerous items.
Vicarious Liability
Responsibility of one party for the actions of another based on their relationship.
Involves employer-employee relationships, not necessarily entrustment.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you may be involved in a negligent entrustment situation, consider the following steps:
Document the circumstances surrounding the entrustment and any relevant details about the entrustee.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and responsibilities.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates related to liability waivers or other relevant legal documents.
In complex situations, seeking professional legal help is advisable to navigate potential liabilities.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.