We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Morgan Presumption: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Significance
Definition & Meaning
The Morgan presumption is a legal principle that shifts the burden of proof from one party to another in a legal case. Specifically, it requires the individual against whom the presumption operates to present enough evidence to counter the presumed fact. For instance, if a criminal defendant is arrested while possessing an illegal substance, it is presumed that they knowingly possessed it. To overcome this presumption, the defendant must provide sufficient evidence that outweighs the assumption of knowing possession.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Morgan presumption is primarily used in criminal law, particularly in cases involving possession of illegal substances. It plays a crucial role in determining the outcome of cases by establishing a baseline assumption that the accused knowingly possessed the contraband. This presumption can significantly affect the strategies employed by both the prosecution and defense. Users can manage related legal procedures using templates available through US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A person is arrested in a vehicle with a bag of illegal drugs in the glove compartment. The Morgan presumption suggests they knowingly possessed the drugs. To challenge this, the defendant must provide evidence, such as testimony that the bag belonged to someone else.
Example 2: A defendant is found with stolen property in their home. The prosecution can argue the presumption of knowing possession, and the defendant must present evidence to counter this claim. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Variation
California
Allows for a broader range of defenses against the presumption.
Texas
Strictly enforces the presumption in drug-related cases.
New York
Provides specific statutory defenses that can counter the presumption.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Burden of Proof
The obligation to prove one's assertion.
The Morgan presumption specifically shifts this burden to the defendant.
Presumption of Innocence
The principle that one is considered innocent until proven guilty.
The Morgan presumption applies after an arrest, suggesting guilt unless proven otherwise.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where the Morgan presumption applies, it's essential to gather evidence that supports your defense. Consider consulting with a legal professional to understand your options fully. Additionally, US Legal Forms offers a variety of legal form templates that can assist you in managing your case effectively.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.