Exploring the Mary Carter Agreement: Legal Insights and Implications

Q: What happens if a Mary Carter Agreement is challenged in court?

The court may deem the agreement unenforceable, particularly in jurisdictions where it contradicts public policy.

Q: Can I create a Mary Carter Agreement myself?

While you can draft an agreement, it is advisable to consult a legal professional to ensure it complies with applicable laws.

Definition & Meaning

A Mary Carter Agreement is a type of settlement in which a defendant agrees to pay a portion of the plaintiff's damages while still remaining involved in the trial. This arrangement allows the settling defendant to maintain a financial interest in the outcome of the case. However, such agreements are considered void under Texas law, as they contradict public policy. This means that they cannot be enforced in court.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

Mary Carter Agreements are primarily used in civil litigation, particularly in personal injury cases. They allow defendants to settle part of their liability while still participating in the trial, which can influence the jury's perception of the case. However, due to their controversial nature and potential to undermine the integrity of the legal process, these agreements are not widely accepted and are often challenged in court.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

(hypothetical example) In a personal injury case, a defendant agrees to pay the plaintiff $50,000 as part of a Mary Carter Agreement. The defendant remains in the case, allowing them to argue that the plaintiff's damages should be reduced based on their own actions.

Relevant laws & statutes

The primary legal reference for Mary Carter Agreements is found in Texas case law, particularly the ruling in In re Viking Offshore (USA), Inc., which established that such agreements are void as they violate public policy. No other specific statutes govern these agreements directly.

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State	Mary Carter Agreement Status
Texas	Void as against public policy
California	Permitted under certain conditions
Florida	Generally accepted, but must be disclosed

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you find yourself involved in a case where a Mary Carter Agreement is proposed, it's crucial to understand its implications. Consider consulting a legal professional to assess your situation. Additionally, you can explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in navigating related legal processes.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Typical fees: Varies by attorney and case complexity.
Jurisdiction: Primarily Texas, but also applicable in other states under different rules.
Possible penalties: Agreements deemed void may lead to legal challenges and costs.