We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Understanding the Lamb-Weston Rule: A Guide to Insurance Liability
Definition & Meaning
The Lamb-Weston rule is a legal principle that helps determine how liability is shared between two insurance companies when their policies cover the same risk but contain conflicting clauses. Originating from the case Lamb-Weston, Inc. v. Oregon Auto. Ins. Co., 219 Ore. 129 (Or. 1959), this rule allows courts to disregard mutually contradictory policy clauses. Instead, it prorates liability based on the coverage limits of each policy, providing a straightforward solution to the ambiguities that can arise in insurance agreements.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Lamb-Weston rule is primarily used in civil law, particularly in insurance disputes. It is applicable when two or more insurance policies overlap in coverage but include conflicting terms regarding liability. This rule can simplify the resolution of claims, making it easier for policyholders and insurers to understand their responsibilities. Users can manage related legal forms through US Legal Forms, which offers templates tailored to insurance claims and disputes.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) Consider two auto insurance policies covering the same vehicle. Policy A states it will cover damages up to $50,000, while Policy B states it will only cover damages if Policy A does not apply. If an accident occurs, the Lamb-Weston rule would allow the insurers to prorate the liability based on their respective coverage limits, rather than leaving the policyholder without coverage due to conflicting terms.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Application of Lamb-Weston Rule
California
Generally applies the Lamb-Weston rule in insurance disputes.
Texas
May apply different standards for conflicting insurance clauses.
New York
Follows the Lamb-Weston rule but may have specific exceptions.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Pro rata
A method of dividing liability based on the proportion of coverage.
Pro rata applies only to the share of liability, while Lamb-Weston also disregards conflicting clauses.
Escape clause
A provision that allows an insurer to deny coverage under certain conditions.
Escape clauses may be ignored under the Lamb-Weston rule if they conflict with other coverage terms.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation involving conflicting insurance policies, consider the following steps:
Review your insurance policies carefully to identify any conflicting clauses.
Consult with an insurance professional or legal expert to understand your rights and obligations.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates related to insurance claims to help you navigate the process.
If the matter is complex, seek professional legal assistance to ensure your interests are protected.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.