We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Inadmissible Evidence: What You Need to Know About Its Legal Definition
Definition & Meaning
Inadmissible evidence refers to information or material that cannot be presented in a court of law during a trial. This exclusion is determined by specific rules of evidence that vary by jurisdiction. The role of the judge is to apply these rules to decide whether the evidence can be considered in the case. Even if evidence is deemed admissible, a judge may choose not to introduce it if it is repetitive or if its potential to mislead the jury outweighs its usefulness in proving a point.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is commonly used in various areas of law, including:
Civil Law: In civil cases, inadmissible evidence can affect the outcome of disputes between individuals or organizations.
Criminal Law: In criminal cases, evidence that is inadmissible may prevent a jury from hearing information that could impact a defendant's guilt or innocence.
Family Law: In family court, certain evidence may be excluded to protect the privacy of individuals involved.
Users can manage some aspects of their cases using legal templates from US Legal Forms, which are drafted by real attorneys to help navigate these complexities.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Here are a couple of examples of inadmissible evidence:
(Hypothetical example): A witness attempts to introduce a personal opinion about the character of a defendant, which is deemed inadmissible as it does not provide factual evidence relevant to the case.
(Hypothetical example): A lawyer tries to present a document that was not disclosed during pre-trial discovery, making it inadmissible due to procedural rules.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
California
Strict rules on hearsay evidence; many exceptions apply.
New York
Allows certain character evidence in criminal cases under specific circumstances.
Texas
More lenient on the admissibility of evidence, with a focus on relevance.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Admissible Evidence
Evidence that can be legally presented in court.
Admissible evidence meets legal standards and can be used to support claims.
Hearsay
Testimony about what someone else said outside of court.
Hearsay is generally inadmissible unless it falls under an exception.
Cumulative Evidence
Evidence that repeats what has already been presented.
Cumulative evidence may be excluded to avoid redundancy.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe evidence in your case may be inadmissible, consider the following steps:
Review the rules of evidence in your jurisdiction.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in preparing your case.
In complex situations, professional legal help is often necessary to navigate the intricacies of admissibility.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.