We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Hilo Settlement: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Framework
Definition & Meaning
A Hilo settlement, also known as a high-low agreement, is a legal arrangement between a plaintiff and a defendant in which the defendant agrees to pay the plaintiff a minimum amount if the case goes to trial. In return, the plaintiff agrees to accept a maximum amount, regardless of the trial's outcome. This type of agreement serves as an alternative to a full settlement and can be established before or during a trial.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Hilo settlements are commonly used in civil litigation, particularly in personal injury cases. They provide a structured way for parties to manage the risks associated with trial outcomes. By agreeing to a minimum and maximum recovery, both parties can avoid the uncertainty of a jury verdict. Users can utilize legal templates from US Legal Forms to draft these agreements, ensuring they meet legal standards and protect their interests.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) In a personal injury case, the defendant agrees to pay the plaintiff a minimum of $50,000 if the case goes to trial. The plaintiff, in turn, agrees to accept a maximum of $100,000, regardless of the jury's decision. This arrangement provides both parties with a clear understanding of potential outcomes and financial implications.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Key Differences
Texas
Hilo settlements are commonly used and recognized in personal injury cases.
California
Specific rules govern the enforceability of high-low agreements, requiring clear terms.
New York
High-low agreements must be documented and approved by the court in some cases.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Settlement Agreement
A mutual agreement between parties to resolve a dispute without trial.
Does not typically include minimum and maximum payment terms.
Release Agreement
A contract where one party relinquishes the right to pursue further legal action.
Focuses on releasing claims rather than establishing payment limits.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you are involved in a legal dispute where a Hilo settlement may be applicable, consider the following steps:
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft a Hilo settlement agreement.
Ensure that all terms are clearly defined and agreed upon by both parties.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Possible Penalties: Breach of contract may lead to legal action.
Key takeaways
Frequently asked questions
A Hilo settlement is an agreement that sets a minimum payment from the defendant and a maximum amount the plaintiff agrees to accept, regardless of trial outcomes.
Yes, Hilo settlements are legally enforceable contracts if they meet the necessary legal requirements.
Consider a Hilo settlement if you want to limit financial risks associated with a trial outcome.