Understanding Fraud on the Minority: Legal Insights and Implications

Q: Can minority shareholders take legal action?

Yes, they can file a derivative suit if they can prove fraud on the minority.

Q: What are some examples of fraud on the minority?

Examples include undervaluing shares in buyouts or unfairly altering company bylaws.

Definition & Meaning

Fraud on the minority occurs when a majority of members in a company misuse their voting power to the detriment of the minority shareholders. This improper exercise of power often results in decisions that do not benefit the company as a whole. Such actions can include passing resolutions that alter the company's articles of association, for example, allowing the compulsory purchase of minority members' shares. When this type of fraud is identified, the resolutions passed can be deemed voidable.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

This term is primarily used in corporate law, particularly in cases involving shareholder rights and corporate governance. Fraud on the minority can lead to derivative lawsuits, where minority shareholders seek to hold the majority accountable for their actions. Users may find it beneficial to utilize legal forms and templates, such as those offered by US Legal Forms, to navigate these complex situations effectively.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A majority shareholder group votes to change the company's bylaws to allow for the forced buyout of minority shareholders at a price below market value. This action could be considered fraud on the minority.

Example 2: A company's board, controlled by majority shareholders, decides to sell a valuable asset to a company owned by one of the majority shareholders at an undervalued price, disadvantaging minority shareholders. (hypothetical example)

State-by-state differences

Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):

State	Key Differences
Delaware	Strong protections for minority shareholders; courts are more likely to recognize claims of fraud on the minority.
California	More stringent requirements for proving fraud on the minority, including specific evidence of harm.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Key Differences
Oppression of Minority Shareholders	Actions that unfairly prejudice minority shareholders.	Focuses on unfair treatment rather than fraud.
Derivative Action	A lawsuit brought by a shareholder on behalf of the company.	Can be a remedy for fraud on the minority but is a separate legal action.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe that fraud on the minority has occurred in your company, consider the following steps:

Document any evidence of improper voting or decisions made by the majority.
Consult with a legal professional to discuss your options, including the possibility of filing a derivative suit.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can assist you in preparing necessary legal documents.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Typical fees: Varies based on legal representation.
Jurisdiction: Primarily corporate law within state jurisdictions.
Possible penalties: Resolutions may be voided; potential for damages in derivative suits.

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

What is fraud on the minority?

It refers to the improper exercise of voting power by the majority that harms minority shareholders.