We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Excusable Neglect: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Meaning
Definition & Meaning
Excusable neglect is a legal term that refers to a valid reason for failing to meet a deadline or take a necessary action in a legal case. This may occur due to unforeseen circumstances, reliance on legal counsel, or other justifiable reasons that are not due to the party's own negligence or disregard for the court's process. For instance, if a party misses a deadline to respond to a lawsuit because they were unexpectedly hospitalized, this could be considered excusable neglect.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Excusable neglect is commonly invoked in civil litigation, particularly in cases involving default judgments. It allows parties to request that a court reopen a case or set aside a judgment if they can demonstrate that their failure to act was due to excusable neglect. This concept is relevant in various legal areas, including family law, small claims, and contract disputes. Users can often manage related forms and procedures through resources like US Legal Forms, which provide templates tailored to these situations.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A defendant in a civil lawsuit fails to respond to the complaint because they were in a car accident and hospitalized. Upon recovery, they file a motion to set aside the default judgment, arguing excusable neglect.
Example 2: A plaintiff relies on their attorney's assurance that a motion would be filed on time, but due to a miscommunication, it is not filed. The plaintiff can argue that they acted with excusable neglect based on their reliance on their attorney's promise. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
Excusable neglect is often discussed in case law, particularly in decisions made by appellate courts. Key cases in Wisconsin include:
Pagels v. Vargas, 2004 WI App 21: This case outlines the standard for determining excusable neglect.
Tsuchiya v. Brennan, 215 Wis. 2d 324: This case clarifies that excusable neglect is not synonymous with carelessness.
Rutan v. Miller, 213 Wis. 2d 94: This case emphasizes the need to consider the interests of justice when evaluating claims of excusable neglect.
State-by-state differences
State
Key Differences
Wisconsin
Excusable neglect is defined by case law, focusing on reasonable actions of a prudent person.
California
California courts also recognize excusable neglect but may have different procedural requirements for motions.
New York
New York has specific statutory provisions regarding excusable neglect in civil cases.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Negligence
A failure to take proper care in doing something.
Excusable neglect is a specific type of negligence that is justifiable under certain circumstances.
Default Judgment
A ruling in favor of one party due to the other party's failure to respond.
Excusable neglect can be a basis for setting aside a default judgment.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe excusable neglect applies to your situation, consider the following steps:
Document the circumstances that led to your missed deadline.
Consult with a legal professional to assess your case and prepare a motion if necessary.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you file the appropriate motions.
For complex matters, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.