We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
What is Diversity Jurisdiction? A Comprehensive Legal Overview
Definition & Meaning
Diversity jurisdiction is a legal term that refers to the authority of federal courts to hear cases where the parties involved are from different states, and the amount in dispute exceeds a specified minimum. This type of jurisdiction is important because it helps ensure that parties receive a fair trial, especially in cases where local biases may exist. For diversity jurisdiction to apply, there must be complete diversity, meaning no plaintiff can be from the same state as any defendant. For instance, if a person from Alabama sues a person from Kentucky and a person from Michigan, the federal court can hear the case. However, if the plaintiff also includes another defendant from Alabama, the court would lack jurisdiction due to the absence of complete diversity.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Diversity jurisdiction is primarily used in civil cases, particularly in areas such as contract disputes, tort claims, and business litigation. It allows parties to seek resolution in federal court rather than state court, which can be beneficial in cases where impartiality is a concern. Users can often manage these cases themselves with the right legal forms, such as those provided by US Legal Forms, which are drafted by experienced attorneys.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A resident of Alabama files a lawsuit against a business based in Kentucky for breach of contract, claiming damages of $100,000. In this case, the federal court has diversity jurisdiction due to the parties being from different states and the amount exceeding the minimum threshold.
Example 2: A person from Michigan sues two defendants, one from Ohio and one from Alabama, for negligence. The federal court can hear this case because there is complete diversity among the parties and the amount in controversy is sufficient. (hypothetical example)
Relevant laws & statutes
The primary statute governing diversity jurisdiction is 28 U.S.C. § 1332, which outlines the requirements for federal courts to have jurisdiction based on diversity of citizenship. This statute specifies the conditions under which diversity jurisdiction applies and the minimum amount in controversy required.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Difference
Diversity jurisdiction
Federal court authority over cases with parties from different states.
Requires complete diversity and a minimum amount in controversy.
Federal question jurisdiction
Federal court authority over cases involving federal laws or constitutional issues.
Does not require diversity of citizenship.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe your case qualifies for diversity jurisdiction, consider the following steps:
Gather all relevant documentation regarding your case and the parties involved.
Consult with a legal professional to confirm that your case meets the criteria for diversity jurisdiction.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you file your case in federal court.
If your situation is complex, seeking professional legal help is advisable.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
Diversity jurisdiction is the authority of federal courts to hear cases where the parties are from different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.
Your case qualifies if there is complete diversity between the parties and the amount in controversy exceeds the statutory minimum.
Yes, if your case meets the requirements for diversity jurisdiction, you can file in federal court.