We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Decet Tamen Principem, Servare Leges, Quibus Ipse Solutus Est
Understanding Decet Tamen Principem, Servare Leges, Quibus Ipse Solutus Est: A Legal Perspective
Definition & Meaning
The phrase "Decet tamen principem, servare leges, quibus ipse solutus est" translates to "Nevertheless, it becomes a prince to protect those laws from which he himself is exempt." This principle originates from Roman law and highlights the expectation that those in power should uphold the laws that govern society, even if they are not personally bound by them. It acknowledges the inherent absurdity of a ruler being above the law while still being responsible for its enforcement.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This principle is relevant in discussions about governance, constitutional law, and the limits of authority. In legal practice, it serves as a reminder that leaders must act in accordance with the law, promoting fairness and accountability. It may come into play in civil rights cases, discussions of executive power, and in the context of governmental accountability. Users can manage related legal issues with tools such as US Legal Forms, which provides templates for various legal documents.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
One example of this principle in action could be seen in a government official who is exempt from certain laws but still advocates for their enforcement among the public. For instance, a mayor may not be subject to specific zoning laws but must still ensure that all citizens comply with them.
(Hypothetical example) A governor who issues an executive order that affects public health must still follow the same public health regulations they impose on citizens.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Context
California
State officials are required to adhere to the California Public Records Act.
Texas
State leaders are held to specific ethical standards under the Texas Ethics Commission.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Rule of Law
The principle that all people and institutions are accountable to the law.
This term emphasizes equality under the law, while the original phrase highlights the responsibilities of those in power.
Executive Privilege
The right of the president and other high-level officials to keep certain communications private.
Executive privilege may exempt officials from disclosing information, contrasting with the expectation of accountability in the original phrase.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself in a situation where this principle is relevant, consider the following steps:
Understand your rights and responsibilities under the law.
Consult legal resources or templates available through US Legal Forms for guidance on compliance.
If the situation is complex or involves significant legal implications, seek advice from a legal professional.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.