The term de bono et malo translates to "for good and evil." Historically, it refers to a specific legal writ that was issued for individual prisoners rather than a blanket order for all prisoners. This approach was used in the past to address the cases of prisoners more specifically. However, due to its cumbersome nature, a general commission for all prisoners was established to streamline the process.
This term is primarily used in the context of criminal law, particularly in relation to the rights of prisoners and the legal processes concerning their detention. The writ of de bono et malo was significant in ensuring that each prisoner's situation was evaluated individually. In modern legal practice, users may encounter similar concepts when dealing with prisoner rights or appeals. Legal templates provided by US Legal Forms can help users navigate these processes.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, in a hypothetical scenario, a prisoner may file for a writ of de bono et malo to contest their detention based on specific circumstances that warrant a review of their case. This writ would allow the court to evaluate the merits of their individual situation rather than relying on a generalized assessment.
| Term | Definition | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|
| Writ of Habeas Corpus | A legal order requiring a person to be brought before a judge. | Focuses on unlawful detention rather than individual prisoner assessments. |
| General Jail Delivery | A blanket order for the release of all prisoners. | Contrasts with the individualized approach of de bono et malo. |
If you believe that the principles of de bono et malo apply to your situation, consider seeking legal advice to understand your options. You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that may assist you in filing necessary documents or petitions. If your case is complex, it may be beneficial to consult with a legal professional.
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It was designed to evaluate individual cases of prisoners rather than applying a blanket approach.