Damage per se: A Comprehensive Guide to Its Legal Definition

Q: In what cases is damage per se applicable?

It is commonly applicable in cases of defamation, such as libel and slander.

Q: Can a defendant challenge damage per se?

Yes, the defendant can present an affirmative defense to rebut the presumption of damage.

Definition & Meaning

Damage per se refers to a type of harm where damages are automatically assumed to occur when a tort is committed. In these cases, the injured party does not need to prove actual damages. For example, in instances of libel that involve serious accusations, such as claims of a crime or a contagious disease, the law presumes that damage has occurred. However, the defendant can challenge these presumed damages by providing evidence to support an affirmative defense, shifting the burden of proof onto them.

Table of content

Legal Use & context

This term is primarily used in civil law, particularly in cases involving defamation, such as libel and slander. It is significant in personal injury claims where the nature of the tort itself implies harm. Users may find it helpful to utilize legal forms related to defamation or personal injury claims, which can be accessed through platforms like US Legal Forms, where templates are crafted by experienced attorneys.

Key legal elements

Real-world examples

Here are a couple of examples of abatement:

Example 1: A newspaper publishes false information accusing a business owner of fraud. The business owner does not need to prove that their reputation was harmed; the law assumes damage has occurred.

Example 2: A person is falsely labeled as having a contagious disease in a public forum. The individual can claim damage per se without needing to demonstrate specific losses. (hypothetical example)

State-by-state differences

State	Notes
California	Recognizes damage per se in defamation cases, allowing for presumed damages.
New York	Also allows for damage per se in libel cases, with specific statutes governing defamation.
Texas	Similar provisions for presumed damages exist, but the burden of proof may vary.

This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.

Comparison with related terms

Term	Definition	Difference
Actual damages	Compensation for specific losses incurred.	Requires proof of loss, unlike damage per se.
Consequential damages	Compensation for indirect damages resulting from a tort.	Focuses on indirect harm, while damage per se assumes harm directly from the act.

Common misunderstandings

What to do if this term applies to you

If you believe you have been harmed by a tort that falls under damage per se, consider the following steps:

Document any relevant information related to the tort.
Consult with a legal professional to understand your rights and options.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can assist you in filing a claim or responding to a tort.

In complex situations, seeking professional legal help is advisable.

Find the legal form that fits your case

Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.

This field is required

Quick facts

Type: Civil Law
Common Areas: Defamation, Personal Injury
Burden of Proof: Shifts to the defendant in some cases

Key takeaways

Frequently asked questions

What is damage per se?

Damage per se refers to a legal principle where harm is presumed to have occurred without the need for proof of actual damages.