We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Closing Argument: The Final Persuasive Moment in Legal Trials
Definition & Meaning
A closing argument is the final opportunity for attorneys to present their case to the judge or jury after all evidence has been presented during a trial. This argument summarizes the key facts, evidence, and witness testimonies, aiming to persuade the trier of fact toward a specific conclusion. It serves as a last chance for lawyers to reinforce their positions before deliberations begin.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Closing arguments are a critical component of both civil and criminal trials. They occur after the presentation of evidence and before the jury or judge deliberates on the case. In criminal cases, the prosecution and defense use closing arguments to highlight their interpretations of the evidence, while in civil cases, they may focus on liability and damages. Users can find legal templates for drafting closing arguments through resources like US Legal Forms, which can assist in preparing these essential documents.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
(Hypothetical example) In a criminal trial for theft, the prosecutor's closing argument might emphasize the eyewitness testimony and physical evidence linking the defendant to the crime, urging the jury to find the defendant guilty. Conversely, the defense attorney may highlight inconsistencies in the eyewitness accounts and argue for reasonable doubt, asking the jury to acquit the defendant.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Closing Argument Guidelines
California
Closing arguments are limited in time, typically set by the judge.
New York
Attorneys may use visual aids during closing arguments.
Texas
Closing arguments must not introduce new evidence.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Opening Statement
An initial presentation outlining what each party intends to prove.
Opening statements are made before evidence is presented, while closing arguments summarize the evidence.
Rebuttal
A response to opposing arguments presented during the trial.
Rebuttals occur after closing arguments and aim to counter specific points made by the opposition.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself involved in a legal case where closing arguments are relevant, consider the following steps:
Review the evidence and key points of your case thoroughly.
Draft a clear and persuasive closing argument, focusing on the strengths of your case.
Consider using templates from US Legal Forms to aid in structuring your argument.
If the situation is complex, seek assistance from a legal professional to ensure your argument is effective.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.