Am I liable for costs after my car was removed as abandoned?

Full question:

I sold my car to my niece. But she neither gave the money nor changed the ownership to her name. She parked the car in a highway and gone. After a week, I found that the authorities removed the car. The car has also some damages by the removal. Am I liable for the costs of removal? Can I sue the authorities for those damages?

Answer:

Your car is considered an abandoned vehicle because it was left unattended on a highway for more than 48 hours. As the last registered owner, you are liable to the authorities for the costs associated with its removal and storage. You cannot sue the authorities for any damages that occurred during the removal, as they are not responsible for loss or damage to abandoned vehicles under the law. This is outlined in R.R.S. Neb. § 60-1906, which states that neither the owner nor the authorities are liable for damages to a vehicle removed as abandoned.

This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.

FAQs

Yes, it matters whose name is on the car. The last registered owner is typically held responsible for any legal obligations, including costs associated with abandoned vehicles. If the ownership was not transferred to your niece, you remain liable for the car's status and any related costs, even if you sold it.