Can I be liable for not taking an injured child to the hospital?

Full question:

I was driving to work when I saw a small boy got hit by a motorbike. I was getting late to work but with an intention of saving the kid’s life, I went up to him checked his injury and then asked another guy to take him to the hospital. I gave little money to this guy for taking the kid to the hospital. Can I land into trouble for not taking the kid to the hospital myself?

Answer:

If you acted in good faith to help the child and arranged for his transportation to the hospital, you may be protected under Indiana's Good Samaritan law. Although you did not take the child to the hospital yourself, your actions—checking his injury and giving money to someone else to help—likely provide you with immunity from civil liability. According to Indiana law (Burns Ind. Code Ann. § 34-30-12-1), individuals who assist in emergencies are generally immune from liability for any injuries that result from their actions, as long as they do not engage in gross negligence or willful misconduct. Therefore, you are likely not liable for not personally taking the child to the hospital.

This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.

FAQs

If you hit a child on a bike, you may face legal consequences, including potential civil liability for damages. The specifics depend on the circumstances, such as whether you were negligent. It's important to check on the child’s condition and call for medical assistance. In some cases, you might be protected under Good Samaritan laws if you help the injured child. Always consult a legal professional for guidance based on your situation.