Do I Have to Pay a Debt Under a Divorce Decree if the Former Spouse Dies?

Full question:

We were stupid and used only 1 attorney to file for divorce. I agreed to be responsible for half the debt on a bank loan that only he, not I, signed as guarantor. He'd lied to me and told me I had signed the loan but in reality I never did. What I found later is that what I did sign was only paperwork to give me access to account for withdrawals and such. I verified with this with the bank that I am not obligated to them only to my ex. according to the divorce decree. Well, my ex just died. Am I still responsible to pay his children? I was so upset that he'd lied to me but I was stupid and ignorant to not realize it.

  • Category: Divorce
  • Subcategory: Property Settlements
  • Date:
  • State: Kansas

Answer:

It will be difficult to appeal the divorce decree for fraud if the ex-spouse is deceased. Generally, a bank, because it is not a party to a divorce decree, does not consider itself bound by the terms of a divorce decree and will pursue collection according to the loan contracts. The bank may present a claim in the probate of the estate, assuming they are noticed of the probate action as a creditor of the estate. You may also assert a claim against the estate. It will be a matter of subjective determination for the court, based on all the facts and documents involved, whether to order the estate to pay the claim or not.

Please see the following KS statutes:

59-709. Filing of certain petitions; notice to creditors.

(a) Every petitioner who files a petition for administration or probate of a will shall give notice thereof to creditors, pursuant to an order of the court, and within 10 days after such filing. Such notice shall be published in some newspaper of the county authorized by law to publish legal notices and shall be published once a week for three consecutive weeks. A petitioner for the appointment of a successor administrator, administrator CTA or administrator DBN shall publish notice to creditors only in the event the original petitioner for administration or for the probate of a will had failed to give such notice.

(b) The personal representative of a decedent's estate shall give actual notice to known or reasonably ascertainable creditors prior to the expiration of the nonclaim statute.

(c) Notwithstanding any other notice requirements of the probate code, notice to creditors shall not be necessary if a petition for administration or probate of a will shall have been filed after the period of time prescribed by K.S.A. 59-2239, and amendments thereto, for the timely exhibit of creditors' claims.

59-2239. Claims against estate; time for filing; when barred.

(1) All demands, including demands of the state, against a decedent's estate, whether due or to become due, whether absolute or contingent, including any demand arising from or out of any statutory liability of decedent or on account of or arising from any liability as surety, guarantor or indemnitor, and including the individual demands of executors and administrators, shall be forever barred from payment unless the demand is presented within the later of: (a) four months from the date of first publication of notice under K.S.A. 59-2236, and amendments thereto; or (b) if the identity of the creditor is known or reasonably ascertainable, 30 days after actual notice was given, except that the provisions of the testator's will requiring the payment of a demand exhibited later shall control. No creditor shall have any claim against or lien upon the property of a decedent other than liens existing at the date of the decedent's death, unless a petition is filed for the probate of the decedent's will pursuant to K.S.A. 59-2220 and amendments thereto or for the administration of the decedent's estate pursuant to K.S.A. 59-2219 and amendments thereto within six months after the death of the decedent and such creditor has exhibited the creditor's demand in the manner and within the time prescribed by this section, except as otherwise provided by this section.

(2) Nothing in this section shall affect or prevent the enforcement of a claim arising out of tort against the personal representative of a decedent within the period of the statute of limitations provided for an action on such claim. For the purpose of enforcing such claims, the estate of the decedent may be opened or reopened, a special administrator appointed, and suit filed against the administrator within the period of the statute of limitations for such action. Any recovery by the claimant in such action shall not affect the distribution of the assets of the estate of the decedent unless a claim was filed in the district court within the time allowed for filing claims against the estate under subsection (1) or an action commenced as provided in subsection (2) of K.S.A. 59-2238 and amendments thereto. The action may be filed in any court of competent jurisdiction and the rules of pleading and procedure in the action shall be the same as apply in civil actions. Any such special administration shall be closed and the special administrator promptly discharged when the statute of limitations for filing such actions has expired and no action has been filed or upon conclusion of any action filed. All court costs incurred in a proceeding under this subsection shall be taxed to the petitioner.

This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.

FAQs

In a divorce, responsibility for credit card debt typically depends on how the debt was incurred. If the debt was accumulated during the marriage, both spouses may be held responsible, even if only one spouse's name is on the account. The divorce decree will outline how debts are divided, but creditors can still pursue either spouse for payment. It's important to review your divorce agreement and consult with a legal professional if you have concerns about specific debts.