Is discovery necessary in a partition suit?

Full question:

I am in the middle of a Partition Suit that I have filed and one of the owners has asked me to fill out a Discovery. Is a Discovery necessary for a case of this nature?

  • Category: Discovery
  • Date:
  • State: California

Answer:

Whether discovery is necessary depends on the specific circumstances of your case, but it is generally routine in lawsuits. Once you receive a discovery request, you must respond or object within the deadline, usually 28 to 30 days.

The scope of discovery is broad, allowing the other party to seek information that may lead to relevant evidence. However, the court can limit discovery if it finds that the burden or expense outweighs the likelihood of obtaining admissible evidence. If you believe a request is irrelevant, overly broad, or harassing, you can object and seek a protective order from the court.

Discovery is a common procedure to uncover facts and documents supporting the claims in a case. In a partition suit, relevant questions might include the period of ownership or how ownership was acquired, as well as any existing claims like liens on the property. You may be asked for documents like deeds and could be required to attend a deposition.

Discovery involves various methods, such as interrogatories (written questions), requests for admission (statements to admit or deny), and requests for document production. If a party refuses to answer, a motion for contempt or sanctions may be filed.

In state court, discovery motions are governed by the state's Rules of Civil Procedure. It's advisable to check with the clerk of courts for specific discovery rules and timelines applicable to your case.

This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.

FAQs

Information that is discoverable but not admissible includes materials that may be relevant to the case but do not meet the legal standards for evidence in court. For example, hearsay statements or documents that violate privacy rights may be discoverable during the discovery phase but could be excluded during the trial. Additionally, internal communications or drafts that are not finalized might be discoverable but not admissible as evidence.