Full question:
My sister, with whom I was very close, had told me, a niece, and another sister that she wanted to add my name to the deed of her home. She had an extensive portfolio of investments with my other siblings as beneficiaries. I was not then named as a beneficiary on any of those. When she became hospitalized for cancer, she had my sister call to have me come to Washington, DC to talk with her investment advisor to add my name to the deed of her home. She became increasingly more ill, had surgery, hospitalization, then died intestate without either of those wishes having been fulfilled. During her illness, I traveled from Boston (where I live) to be with her approximtely every 2 weeks from August until her death. Now I, among my 5 siblings, am not named as beneficiary on any of her bank accounts or investments. Since I was to inherit her house, I am unfairly excluded from any other of her assets (including the house). My sister, who she had call me and to whom she entrusted to handle her affairs while ill, will testify to my sister's intentions regarding me. My other siblings express no willingness on their own to share or include me in the relatively large inheritance they will receive as named beneficiaries. Even if I receive any part of her assets with no named beneficiary, it will be less than some children of 4 deceased siblings (many of whom never met my sister and had no relationship with her) will receive under Probate rules. I was unintentionally and now unjustly excluded due to her incapacity caused by the graveness of her illness and untimely death. With my sister's and my niece's testimony as witness to her intentions regarding me, do I have a chance of receiving her house when the estate is divided? There would be a discenting sibling who wants the house for herself in spite of receiving most of my sister's large bank assets. She died in Washington, DC. My deceased sister lived in and died in Washington, DC. She was unmarried, no children, parents deceased; 6 surviving siblings, 4 predeceased siblings--one is named beneficiary and each with adult children. I am the youngest, no children, and not a home owner.
- Category: Wills and Estates
- Subcategory: Will Contests
- Date:
- State: Massachusetts
Answer:
Gifts are generally not enforceable like contracts because they lack consideration, meaning they are given without something in return. Courts typically do not enforce promises to make gifts unless the recipient can show detrimental reliance on the gift. For instance, if a charity relies on a promised donation to build a hospital, that promise may be enforceable.
If a person lacks mental capacity, any contract signed during that time may be void. A contract can also be challenged if it involved fraud, coercion, undue influence, or forgery. If someone waits until they are ill to transfer property, it may be too late for a valid transfer. It is essential to have the capacity to understand the nature of the act when executing a contract.
If someone held power of attorney, there could be a claim for breach of fiduciary duty if they did not follow the principal's instructions. However, if those instructions were not documented, it may be challenging to prove the deceased's wishes and intentions.
This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.