Full question:
When dealing with tribal courts [Sac & Fox Nation Tribal Court of Oklahoma] are the charges 'obstruction of justice' and 'obstruction of governmental function' the same? If not, how are they different?
- Category: Tribal Justice
- Date:
- State: Oklahoma
Answer:
The charges 'obstruction of justice' and 'obstruction of governmental function' are not the same and have different definitions under the law. Obstruction of Government Function occurs when a person intentionally hinders or prevents the administration of law or a governmental function. In contrast, Obstruction of Justice involves interference with the legal process, which can happen during investigations or trials, such as threatening a juror or witness.
Public Law 280 allows certain states to exercise criminal and civil jurisdiction over Indians in Indian country. The distinction between criminal prohibitory and civil regulatory laws means that if a state law prohibits certain conduct, it falls under Public Law 280's jurisdiction. However, if the state law permits conduct but regulates it, it is civil/regulatory, and Public Law 280 does not allow its enforcement on Indian reservations.
In Oklahoma, obstruction charges are generally classified as criminal. Therefore, the state may prohibit such conduct on tribal lands. The specific nature of the conduct will determine which statute applies. For example, Oklahoma statutes include:
- § 21-540: Obstruction of an officer, which states that anyone who willfully delays or obstructs a public officer in their duties is guilty of a misdemeanor.
- § 21-1217: Interference with firemen's duties, which states that anyone who knowingly interferes with firemen performing their duties can be charged with a felony, punishable by imprisonment of two to ten years.
This content is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Legal statutes mentioned reflect the law at the time the content was written and may no longer be current. Always verify the latest version of the law before relying on it.