We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Exploring the Allen Charge: A Key Instruction in Jury Deliberations
Definition & Meaning
Allen Charge refers to a judicial instruction given to a jury that is unable to reach a unanimous verdict after deliberation. The purpose of this instruction is to encourage jurors to reconsider their positions and strive for agreement. Named after the landmark case Allen v. United States, 164 U.S. 492 (1896), it establishes that a judge can guide a deadlocked jury to continue discussions in hopes of reaching a verdict. Variations of the original Allen Charge text exist, and judges may adapt it to fit their courtroom while adhering to legal standards.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
The Allen Charge is primarily used in criminal trials where juries face difficulties in reaching a decision. It is relevant in various legal contexts, including:
Criminal law, particularly in cases involving serious charges.
Civil law, though less common.
Jurors are encouraged to reflect on the evidence and their opinions, which can be crucial for resolving deadlocks. Users can find templates for jury instructions, including Allen Charges, through resources like US Legal Forms.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: In a criminal trial for theft, the jury deliberates for several days but cannot agree on a verdict. The judge issues an Allen Charge, urging them to reconsider their positions and continue discussions.
Example 2: A jury in a civil case regarding a breach of contract is deadlocked. The judge delivers an Allen Charge, highlighting the implications of a mistrial and encouraging jurors to reach a consensus. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Variation
California
Judges may provide additional guidance on the importance of reaching a verdict.
Texas
Allen Charges are more strictly regulated, with specific language required.
New York
Judges often use a modified version that emphasizes jurors' independence.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Difference
Hung Jury
A jury that cannot reach a unanimous decision.
An Allen Charge is given to encourage a hung jury to deliberate further.
Mistrial
A trial that is invalid due to an error or hung jury.
An Allen Charge aims to avoid a mistrial by prompting jurors to reach a verdict.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you find yourself on a jury that receives an Allen Charge, consider the following steps:
Reflect on the evidence presented and your fellow jurors' viewpoints.
Engage in open discussions with other jurors to explore differing perspectives.
Remember that reaching a verdict is essential for the case's resolution, but do not feel pressured to abandon your honest beliefs.
For those involved in legal proceedings, exploring US Legal Forms can provide helpful templates for jury instructions and other legal documents.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.