The all-steps rule is a principle in patent law that states a method or process claim can only be considered infringed if the accused process includes every step or limitation of the original claim, or an equivalent. This means that for a patent holder to prove infringement, they must demonstrate that the accused party's method replicates all aspects of their patented process.
The all-steps rule is primarily used in patent litigation. It is relevant in cases involving intellectual property, particularly in technology and manufacturing sectors. This rule helps determine whether a competitor's product or process infringes on an existing patent. Users can manage related legal processes using templates from US Legal Forms, which are designed by attorneys to assist in patent applications and infringement claims.
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
For instance, if a patent claims a method for manufacturing a specific type of battery that includes steps A, B, and C, a competitor's process that only uses steps A and B would not infringe on the patent (hypothetical example). Conversely, if the competitor's process includes a step that is an equivalent to step C, they might still be found to infringe.
| Term | Definition | Difference |
|---|---|---|
| All-Steps Rule | A principle requiring all steps of a patent claim to be present for infringement. | Focuses specifically on the completeness of steps in a method claim. |
| Doctrine of Equivalents | A legal rule allowing for infringement claims even if the accused process does not literally infringe. | Allows for some flexibility in interpreting steps, unlike the all-steps rule. |
If you believe your patent has been infringed, gather evidence of the accused process and consult a legal professional. You can also explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft necessary legal documents or claims related to patent infringement.
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.
It is a principle in patent law stating that all steps of a patented method must be present in an accused process for infringement to be established.