We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Action De In Rem Verso: A Comprehensive Guide to Unjust Enrichment
Definition & Meaning
The term "action de in rem verso" refers to a legal action taken to recover unjust enrichment. In simpler terms, it is a way for a person to seek compensation when someone else has benefited at their expense without a valid reason. To succeed in this type of action, the plaintiff must demonstrate that:
They provided a benefit to the other party.
This benefit caused them financial loss.
There is no legal justification for the other party's gain.
They do not have any other adequate legal remedy available, such as a contract claim.
This concept has roots in Roman law, where it was used against a head of a household or a slave owner who profited from transactions involving dependents.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
Action de in rem verso is primarily used in civil law contexts, particularly in cases involving unjust enrichment. This legal action may arise in various scenarios, such as:
Disputes over payments for services not rendered.
Situations where goods are mistakenly delivered to the wrong party.
Individuals can use legal templates from US Legal Forms to draft necessary documents related to this action, making it easier to pursue claims without extensive legal knowledge.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Here are a couple of examples illustrating the action de in rem verso:
Hypothetical example: A contractor mistakenly overpays a supplier for materials that were not delivered. The contractor can pursue an action de in rem verso to recover the excess payment.
Hypothetical example: A person receives a benefit from a service they did not request, such as landscaping work done on their property by mistake. They may be liable to pay for the service, but they can also seek to recover the costs if they can prove unjust enrichment.
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Notes
California
Recognizes unjust enrichment claims under various circumstances.
New York
Allows claims for unjust enrichment but requires clear proof of benefit and loss.
Texas
Similar principles apply, but the burden of proof may vary.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Unjust enrichment
Legal principle preventing one party from benefiting at another's expense without compensation.
Broader concept; action de in rem verso is a specific legal remedy.
Quasi-contract
An obligation imposed by law to prevent unjust enrichment, even in the absence of a contract.
Quasi-contracts can exist without a direct benefit transfer, while action de in rem verso requires it.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have a claim for unjust enrichment, consider the following steps:
Gather evidence of the benefit received and your resulting loss.
Determine if you have any other legal remedies available.
Consult with a legal professional for tailored advice.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you draft necessary legal documents.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.