We use cookies to improve security, personalize the user experience,
enhance our marketing activities (including cooperating with our marketing partners) and for other
business use.
Click "here" to read our Cookie Policy.
By clicking "Accept" you agree to the use of cookies. Read less
Actio quod jussu refers to a legal action taken against a master or employer for acts performed by a servant or employee that are related to the employer's business and executed under the employer's direction. This type of action allows the master to be held accountable for obligations incurred by the servant while acting on their behalf. For example, if a servant enters into a contract or incurs a debt while following the master's orders, the master can be sued for that obligation.
Table of content
Legal Use & context
This term is primarily used in civil law contexts, particularly in cases involving employer-employee relationships. It is relevant in situations where a servant's actions directly impact the master's business or financial obligations. Users may find it useful to explore legal templates from US Legal Forms to manage related legal processes effectively.
Key legal elements
Real-world examples
Here are a couple of examples of abatement:
Example 1: A delivery driver, acting under the instructions of their employer, causes an accident while making deliveries. The employer can be held liable for damages resulting from the driver's actions.
Example 2: A sales representative enters into a contract with a client while following their employer's directives. If the contract leads to a dispute, the employer may be sued for obligations arising from that contract. (hypothetical example)
State-by-state differences
Examples of state differences (not exhaustive):
State
Legal Framework
California
Recognizes actio quod jussu in employer liability cases, emphasizing the scope of employment.
New York
Similar principles apply, but courts may assess the degree of control the employer had over the employee's actions.
Texas
Employers can be held liable for actions of employees if they were acting within the course and scope of their employment.
This is not a complete list. State laws vary, and users should consult local rules for specific guidance.
Comparison with related terms
Term
Definition
Key Differences
Vicarious liability
A legal doctrine holding an employer responsible for the negligent actions of employees performed within the scope of their employment.
Actio quod jussu specifically involves actions taken under the master's orders, while vicarious liability covers broader negligent acts.
Respondeat superior
A legal principle that holds an employer liable for the actions of employees performed in the course of their employment.
Actio quod jussu focuses on the master's direct orders, while respondeat superior applies more generally to employee actions.
Common misunderstandings
What to do if this term applies to you
If you believe you have a claim under actio quod jussu, consider the following steps:
Document the actions taken by the employee and any relevant communications with the employer.
Consult a legal professional to evaluate your case and discuss potential legal actions.
Explore US Legal Forms for templates that can help you prepare necessary legal documents.
Find the legal form that fits your case
Browse our library of 85,000+ state-specific legal templates.